Kylie Jenner is facing another legal fight after a former maid filed a lawsuit accusing the reality star, her companies, and members of her home staff of workplace discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, and labor violations. The current complaint contains allegations involving a dog bite, accidental pepper spray exposure, and an event in which the former employee alleges she was imprisoned inside Jenner’s luxurious walk-in wardrobe for more than an hour.
Kylie Jenner is once again at the heart of a major legal storm. The millionaire beauty entrepreneur and reality television celebrity is facing her fourth lawsuit involving a former home staff in just seven months, adding another chapter to a string of court conflicts about the treatment of workers at her properties.
The latest case was filed on November 5, 2026, in Los Angeles Superior Court by Dinora Carolina Cabria Amaya, a former cleaner who says she faced continuous workplace maltreatment while working for Jenner and her connected organizations.
According to the complaint, Amaya has accused Jenner, several of her firms, and members of her home staff of handicap discrimination, retaliation, wrongful termination, and multiple labor violations.
However, one particular event mentioned in the legal complaint has gained great attention: Amaya claims she was unintentionally confined inside Jenner’s massive walk-in closet for more than an hour while her supervisor allegedly scoffed at her calls for aid.
The complaint also cites alleged workplace injuries, unpaid overtime, arguments over travel reimbursements, and worries about how staff were treated within the celebrity’s household.
Jenner’s legal representation has aggressively disputed the charges, branding the suits as meritless and promised to defend the defendants in court.
Here’s all we know about the latest lawsuit and the three earlier staff cases that have thrown Jenner’s domestic employment practices under investigation.
Kylie Jenner’s Fourth Employee Lawsuit in Seven Months
The latest legal action is the fourth lawsuit brought by a former domestic employee against Jenner or her companies since April 2026.
Amaya filed her case on November 5, stating that her working circumstances were increasingly tough throughout her tenure.
According to the court records, she began working for Jenner in March 2025. She reportedly received $40 per hour in cash and often worked six days a week.
Despite the demanding schedule, Amaya contends that she was often denied overtime compensation and was not properly reimbursed for the time and mileage related with commuting between Jenner’s multiple residences.
Her complaint also raises issues regarding occupational injuries, claimed discrimination, and the conduct of supervisors responsible for overseeing home employees.
The complaint names Jenner, her companies, and many members of her staff as defendants.
While the claims have not been substantiated in court, the latest lawsuit adds to a succession of issues involving former members of the celebrity’s household workers.
Former Housekeeper Claims She Was Trapped Inside Kylie Jenner’s Luxury Closet
One of the most unique and attention-grabbing allegations in the complaint surrounds an occurrence inside Jenner’s walk-in closet.
According to Amaya’s allegation, she was ordered by her supervisor, Laura Dooley, to enter the closet using a passcode.
However, the former housekeeper claimed that she subsequently became locked inside and could not get out.
Amaya states that she remained more over an hour inside the room, becoming increasingly distressed as she attempted to contact her supervisor for aid.
According to the complaint, she contacted Dooley and constantly requested for aid.
Instead of promptly arranging for someone to liberate her, the supervisor allegedly laughed and insulted her plight.
The filing relates the following statement to Dooley:
“No one is at the house that can let you out and I cannot give the password to anyone else, you just have to wait.”
Amaya alleges that she was eventually released when someone arrived to open the closet.
The incident has become one of the primary charges in the case because it raises questions about employee safety, emergency procedures, and the responsibility of supervisors monitoring domestic workers.
The complaint does not allege that Jenner personally participated in the incident. The allegations against the supervisor and the situation within the closet remain to be explored through the legal process.
Pepper Spray Incident Allegedly Left Former Employee With Eye Problems
The closet incident was not the only workplace-related problem detailed in Amaya’s claim.
The former maid further claimed that she received an injury in September 2025 after an unsecured canister of pepper spray unexpectedly discharged while she was cleaning a drawer in a laundry room.
According to the lawsuit, the toxic substance came into contact with her eyes and face.
Amaya states that she later suffered many symptoms, including:
- Blurry vision.
- Burning and itching.
- Dryness and itching.
- A constant sand-like sensation in her eyes.
The former employee reports that these symptoms lingered following the incident.
Her lawsuit raises questions about the handling and storage of potentially dangerous materials in the workplace and whether sufficient aid was offered following the claimed exposure.
The lawsuit also placed this occurrence within a broader trend of alleged workplace safety problems.
However, the allegations regarding the circumstances of the pepper spray release and the subsequent injuries have not been established in court.
Former Housekeeper Claims She Was Bitten by a Dog While Cleaning
Another event alleged in the lawsuit purportedly occurred the next month.
Amaya claimed that she was bitten by a dog while cleaning a doghouse at one of Jenner’s houses.
According to the lawsuit, she reported the injury but claims she did not obtain substantial support from the personnel responsible for supervising her work.
She further states that she had to acquire over-the-counter medication herself to manage the injury.
The complaint does not merely focus on the dog bite itself. It also raises issues about the response she allegedly received after reporting the event.
For domestic workers who regularly conduct cleaning and maintenance activities around private houses, workplace safety standards and appropriate responses to injuries are essential considerations.
Amaya’s court action contends that the behavior she reportedly encountered was part of a larger pattern of workplace maltreatment.
These claims will need to be examined through the legal proceedings.
Allegations of Unpaid Overtime and Disputed Travel Reimbursements
Beyond the incidents involving the closet, pepper spray, and dog bite, Amaya’s claim also focuses largely on compensation and working conditions.
According to the complaint, she received around $40 per hour while working six days a week.
However, she maintains that she was consistently denied overtime money despite working lengthy hours.
She further argues that her tasks forced her to travel between multiple Jenner properties without receiving sufficient reimbursement for mileage or travel time.
One particularly crucial detail is a debate about reimbursement.
Amaya states that she questioned why another maid was receiving mileage reimbursement when she was not.
According to her complaint, this disagreement occurred just before her employment ended.
She claims she was terminated on February 6, immediately after raising concerns about the discrepancy in reimbursement treatment.
The lawsuit defines the termination as unjust and alleges retribution.
These accusations raise questions regarding employee compensation, workplace policies, and whether domestic workers are receiving the payments and safeguards to which they may be legally entitled.
Former Employee Also Claims She Was Told to Stay Out of Kylie Jenner’s Sight
Amaya’s complaint contains another allegation involving her treatment within Jenner’s houses.
She claims that she was directed to leave rooms or be out of sight because Jenner did not want to see her.
The allegation adds another dimension to the complaint, which accuses the defendants of discrimination and unfair treatment.
Although the complaint does not demonstrate that Jenner directly provided these directives, Amaya’s assertions describe an environment in which she reportedly felt uncomfortable while carrying out her domestic tasks.
The broader question of how domestic staff are treated in wealthy houses has become a big aspect of the legal arguments being addressed by the former employees’ attorney.
What Kylie Jenner’s Legal Team Says About the Allegations
Despite the seriousness of the charges, Jenner’s legal team has fiercely refuted the assertions.
Her attorney, Michael Rhodes, published a statement to Page Six denouncing the latest actions and the legal strategy behind them.
Rhodes noted that the cases were being brought by the same attorney who had previously filed claims on behalf of other former home employees.
He also suggested that the cases were intended to generate publicity and secure an unjustified financial settlement.
In his statement, Rhodes said:
“We’re not going to be intimidated into doing that. As such, we’ll defend these meritless cases vigorously and look forward to telling our side of the story.”
His answer makes apparent that Jenner and the other defendants intend to dispute the allegations rather than accept the claims stated in the complaints.
The legal fight is therefore growing on two sides: former employees are submitting allegations of workplace discrimination and mistreatment, while Jenner’s representatives are refuting the claims and pledging a forceful defense.
The court proceedings will eventually determine how the accusations are resolved.
Looking Back: The Three Earlier Employee Lawsuits
Amaya’s November case is not the first legal dispute involving former staff of Jenner’s household.
Three more former staffers have filed lawsuits against Jenner or her connected companies since April 2026.
The previous cases involve charges of discrimination, harassment, retaliation, pregnancy-related discrimination, and wrongful termination.
Although each complaint concerns different circumstances, all four cases have gained attention because they involve former members of Jenner’s household workers.
1. Angelica Hernandez Vasquez Filed a Lawsuit on April 17
The first of the three earlier lawsuits referenced in the paper was filed on April 17, 2026, by former housekeeper Angelica Hernandez Vasquez.
She accused Jenner and her firms of harassment and discrimination due to her Salvadoran heritage, Catholic beliefs, and immigration status.
According to the lawsuit, Vasquez stated that she was insulted because of her accent and humiliated by other members of the home staff.
She further said that she was routinely assigned unwanted assignments and that her complaints about the alleged behavior were ignored.
One particularly troubling report concerned an event in which a supervisor allegedly flung hangers at her feet.
The case has kept going through the court system.
According to the article, attorneys for both parties engaged in mediation sessions in October and asked further time for Jenner and the other defendants to reply to an updated complaint.
A case management conference was scheduled for November 10, 2026.
2. Juana Delgado Soto Filed Another Lawsuit on April 29
Less than two weeks after Vasquez filed her claim, another former housekeeper, Juana Delgado Soto, began a separate civil action against Jenner and her firms.
Filed on April 29, 2026, the lawsuit charged the defendants of discrimination, harassment, and retaliation.
Soto made various complaints concerning her working circumstances that received substantial attention.
According to her allegation, she was allegedly barred from glancing at Jenner or smiling at her.
She further said that anytime Jenner was home, she was obliged to hide in a toilet or garage for extended hours.
The lawsuit further said that Soto was refused access to drinking water and restroom facilities.
She also stated that she faced mistreatment following the death of her sibling.
These charges, if confirmed, might raise major questions about the working environment and treatment of home employees.
However, these remain assertions made in a court case and have not been substantiated.
According to the article, both sides engaged in mediation meetings in October.
Attorneys also requested further time for Jenner and the other defendants to reply to the complaint, seeking a new deadline of November 20, 2026.
3. Former Private Chef Filed a Lawsuit on June 22
The third earlier complaint featured a former private chef described in court records as Jane Doe.
She filed her complaint on June 22, 2026, charging Jenner and many members of her team of pregnancy discrimination and unlawful termination.
The claims in this instance are particularly serious because they affect the chef’s purported high-risk pregnancy and subsequent pregnancy loss.
According to the complaint, the cook said she was expected to undertake physically demanding responsibilities and work long hours despite her pregnancy-related medical concerns.
One incident cited in the lawsuit allegedly occurred during a family birthday celebration in Palm Springs, California.
The cook said that she was obliged to work rigorous shifts throughout the occasion.
She said that she woke up the following morning suffering significant bleeding and later learnt at the hospital that she had suffered a miscarriage.
The former employee reportedly accused Jenner’s staff of mistreating her following the pregnancy loss and ultimately terminating her position.
The matter has progressed through the courts, with Jenner’s legal team rejecting the chef’s wish to stay nameless.
In an October court filing, Jenner’s attorneys sought a judge to order the former chef to reveal her identify.
According to the article, a hearing concerning the usage of the Jane Doe pseudonym is scheduled for January 28, 2027.
A separate case management conference is set for January 25, 2027.
The lawsuit’s allegations have not been proven, and the defendants’ stance will be addressed through the legal process.
The Same Attorney Represents All Four Former Employees
Another interesting aspect connecting the four lawsuits is the involvement of the same attorney.
Della Shaker represents all four former employees: Amaya, Vasquez, Soto, and the former private chef identified as Jane Doe.
Several of the lawsuits also list some of the same companies and supervisors among the defendants.
Shaker has claimed that the examples highlight greater questions regarding the abuse of domestic workers employed by rich individuals.
In a statement to Page Six addressing the current allegation, she questioned if domestic staff feel secure disclosing suspected improper behavior when their employers have enormous financial resources and power.
She said:
“This case raises a larger question: how many domestic workers are afraid to report unlawful treatment because they believe their employers are too powerful to challenge?”
Shaker also underlined that workers should be able to speak about their experiences without fearing reprisal.
Her comments suggest that the legal issues are not only about the specific charges but also about broader questions involving labor regulations for domestic employees.
Jenner’s legal team, however, has vehemently opposed the litigation and the attorney’s approach, laying the groundwork for ongoing legal conflicts.
Why the Latest Lawsuit Is Drawing So Much Attention
Kylie Jenner is one of the most famous names in the entertainment and beauty industry.
Through her television appearances, social media presence, and Kylie Cosmetics brand, she has created a large public reputation.
Her affluent lifestyle, vast designer handbag collection, and many residences are routinely covered in entertainment press.
That public image has made the charges concerning her household servants extremely newsworthy.
The latest complaint details a working environment that the former housekeeper claims involves inadequate remuneration, workplace injuries, and unethical treatment by managers.
The three earlier lawsuits have also attracted attention to alleged discrimination, harassment, and employment abuses.
However, it is crucial to distinguish between allegations and verified facts.
The filing of many lawsuits does not automatically prove that the claims are true. Each case must be reviewed separately, and the defendants have the right to respond and present their evidence.
The judicial proceedings will be vital in determining what transpired and whether any laws were violated.
What Happens Next in Kylie Jenner’s Legal Battles?
With four employee lawsuits now involving Jenner or her firms within seven months, attention is turning toward the next stages of the legal procedures.
The current complaint filed by Amaya will need to proceed through the appropriate court process.
Meanwhile, the prior suits are also moving forward.
The Vasquez lawsuit has required mediation and additional court scheduling.
The Soto case has also featured mediation, with the parties requesting further time for submissions.
The former chef’s complaint has future court sessions in January 2027 about her anonymity request and case management.
Jenner’s legal representatives have made it apparent that they intend to dispute the charges strongly.
For now, the major questions remain unsolved, and the courts will have to review the facts and arguments given by both sides.
Final Thoughts: Four Lawsuits in Seven Months Put Kylie Jenner’s Household Employment Practices Under the Spotlight
Kylie Jenner’s latest employment lawsuit has added another huge legal problem to an already complex year.
The former housekeeper’s allegations involving a dog bite, pepper spray exposure, an alleged incident inside Jenner’s walk-in closet, underpaid overtime, and contested travel reimbursements have drawn international attention.
Combined with the three preceding lawsuits involving former household employees, the current allegation has brought additional spotlight to the exploitation of domestic workers in celebrity households.
At the same time, Jenner’s legal team has vehemently disputed the charges and says the defendants will defend themselves in court.
As the cases continue, the attention will be on the evidence, the legal arguments, and the eventual decisions made by the courts.
One thing is certain: the escalating number of legal challenges has made Kylie Jenner’s domestic employment practices a big topic of celebrity news and public discussion.
Legal disclaimer: This article discusses allegations included in lawsuits and remarks made by the parties’ representatives. The allegations have not been proven in court. Kylie Jenner’s legal representative contests the claims, and all defendants are entitled to defend themselves through the judicial process.